Tuesday, June 7, 2011
Monday, June 6, 2011
Sunday, June 5, 2011
Saturday, June 4, 2011
Question 652: The racquet they all created
The Sequence of events leading to the __X__ are as follows:
The Assembly quickly decrees the following:
The National Assembly, considering that it has been called to establish the constitution of the realm, to bring about the regeneration of public order, and to maintain the true principles of monarchy; nothing may prevent it from continuing its deliberations in any place it is forced to establish itself; and, finally, the National Assembly exists wherever its members are gathered.
Bailly: I demand that the secretaries and I ______ first; which they do immediately according to the following formula:
We _____ never to separate ourselves from the National Assembly, and to reassemble wherever circumstances require, until the constitution of the realm is drawn up and fixed upon solid foundations.
Hearing of ___X___, the King called a meeting of the orders. At the end of the meeting he ordered the __Y___ to disperse. They refused. One of the delegates declared that "We are here at the will of the people, . . . and . . . shall not stir from our seats unless forced to do so by bayonets." The King was unwilling to use force and eventually ordered the first and second estates to join the new National Assembly. The ___Y___ had won.
ID X & Y
Friday, June 3, 2011
Question 651: Detective shows teach us a whole lot
The Supreme Court of the United States held that an elicited incriminating statement by a suspect will not constitute admissible evidence unless the suspect was informed of the right to decline to make self-incriminatory statements and the right to legal counsel , and makes a knowing, intelligent and voluntary waiver of those rights.
It is supposed to be a safeguard against self-incrimination. As a result, if law enforcement officials decline to offer the warning to an individual in their custody, they may still interrogate that person and act upon the knowledge gained, but may not use that person's statements to incriminate him or her in a criminal trial.
What's the warning called? You would have heard it tonnes of times (Not the name. But the actual warning).
It is supposed to be a safeguard against self-incrimination. As a result, if law enforcement officials decline to offer the warning to an individual in their custody, they may still interrogate that person and act upon the knowledge gained, but may not use that person's statements to incriminate him or her in a criminal trial.
What's the warning called? You would have heard it tonnes of times (Not the name. But the actual warning).
Thursday, June 2, 2011
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Monday, May 30, 2011
Normal Service Resumed
We'll post regular, non themey questions from tomorrow(tuesday).
If you need to contribute any questions, you know the id!
If you need to contribute any questions, you know the id!
Labels:
Announcements
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













